KFC drive-thru restaurant planned for Wakefield service station on the M1 is refused planning permission

Planning permission for a drive-thru fast food restaurant at a Wakefield service station has been refused over concerns it would encroach onto the green belt.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The proposals were for the southbound side of Woolley Edge services on the M1 near Bretton.

A planning case officer report said: “Whilst it is noted that the scheme would be acceptable having regards to design, residential amenity, highways safety, flood risk and drainage and trees, subject to conditions, the construction of a new building would result in significant harm to the openness of the green belt.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"The construction of a new building on the application site, due to its permanence, height and overall mass, would result in harm to the openness of the green belt and would restrict the views across the site, from the development which currently exists.

Woolley Edge services southbound. Picture by GoogleWoolley Edge services southbound. Picture by Google
Woolley Edge services southbound. Picture by Google

"Therefore, the proposal would be visually more harmful, due to the loss of openness on site, and would reduce the spatial aspects of the application site.”

The report notes that there is another KFC drive-thru a 10 minute drive away at Calder Grove Business Park.

The service station currently has a Costa, Burger King, Krispy Kreme, M&S and WHS Smiths.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A further planning application for a drive-thru Greggs bakery on the northbound side of the service station has not yet been decided.

An environmental statement submitted in support of the proposals argued the plans would not be damaging.

It said: “The proposed development is not anticipated to have an impact on the designated sites within 2km due to distance from each site.

Read More
Plans submitted for drive-thru Greggs and KFC at Wakefield service station on th...

"Within the survey area there is virtually no vegetation cover, and it is considered that there are no ecological constraints within the buffer zone both sides feature areas of existing soft landscaping which comprise low-quality habitats with minimal ecological value.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"Habitats within the buffer zone are at risk of degradation, disturbance and habitat loss throughout the construction and operational phase of the developments however this would not result in any significant impact given the small scale of the proposals and the low value of the habitats.

"Potential exists for ecological enhancements post-development.

"Landscaping proposals could incorporate habitats of better condition and/or greater ecological value.

"This could include wildflower strips, hedgerows or planted trees.”

Related topics: