Plans to install automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras at Nostell Priory approved

The scheme forms part of a wider parking infrastructure upgrade at the visitor attraction in Wakefield.

Other work includes installing solar-powered contactless payment machines within the historic parkland.

The registered park and garden is operated by the National Trust and is close to the Grade I-listed priory.

The National Trust said the development was part of a project to enhance its car parks “through improved internal infrastructure.”

A heritage statement prepared on behalf of the charity said: “The scheme has the potential to deliver public benefits by means of increasing revenue for the National Trust, the biggest conservation charity in Europe.

“The proposals present an opportunity for the greater remuneration of the Trust, with funds going back into the operation of the charity and its conservation work.

“This could include supporting the conservation and restoration of the Nostell Estate.”

The stately home dates from 1733 and was built for the Winn family. It was given to the National Trust in 1953.

The scheme also involves removing three existing parking terminals and installing new park parking signs.

The document said the work would not impact historic buildings close to the site or affect views of the parkland.

It said: “The proposals represent a minimal alteration to the existing modern car park, which does not contribute to the significance of the park and garden as it does not contribute to the artistic interest or the rural and pastoral character of the parkland.

“The car park was intentionally sited in order that any impact on the significance of the park and garden was kept to a minimum.”

No objections were submitted by council’s conservation officer, Historic England or The Gardens Trusts.

A council planning officer’s report said the proposals were acceptable despite the site being within the greenbelt.

It said: “Given the scale and nature of the development proposed, it is considered that the proposals would amount to a very small amount of less than substantial harm.

“Consideration has also been given to matters relating to archaeology, protection of trees, ecology, highways and amenity.”